HateAid files criminal complaint against Meta and Ray-Ban over AI glasses

Legal background: TDDDG and labeling requirement

In addition to Meta and Ray-Ban, the optician Blayzer Optics is also in the focus of the complaint. The organization's argument aims to hold retailers in the distribution chain accountable as well if devices are put into circulation without adequate labeling.

The Federal Network Agency stated on Wednesday that it is closely monitoring the market but has so far not initiated any formal investigations. It therefore remains open whether the authority will consider its own steps or first wait for judicial processing.

The background to the proceedings is the Telecommunications-Digital Services-Data Protection Act. The law requires, among other things, that information-gathering devices collecting data in public spaces must be recognizable to third parties. Smart glasses with hidden cameras could, in HateAid's view, violate this obligation.

Reaction from the Federal Network Agency

The complaint comes amid a broader debate about the regulation of AI applications worn on the body. While manufacturers point to the benefits of assistive functions, data protection organizations see the risk of covert recordings, particularly in public spaces and in the workplace.

Beyond the civil society complaint, it is criminally relevant whether the requirements of the TDDDG are actually met and whether the courts will apply the norm to smart glasses. A decision is not expected until after review by the public prosecutor's office.

Market observers note that, in addition to Blayzer Optics, other opticians such as Mister Spex also carry or could carry corresponding models. This means the debate could affect an entire level of trade, not just individual manufacturers.

Outlook on possible consequences

HateAid announced that it will continue to pursue the matter and advocate for clear labeling requirements. The organization explicitly sees the criminal complaint as a signal to retailers and manufacturers to make their products more transparent.

Until a court decision is reached, the market situation remains unchanged for the time being. Consumers can continue to purchase the devices, with the Federal Network Agency continuing its observation.