Trump claims the United States has removed all mines from the Strait of Hormuz

Trump asserted that the United States controls the waterway «a 100 Prozent», that is, one hundred percent, which in his interpretation guarantees the free navigation of the oil tankers crossing between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. The statement sends a direct message both to Iran and to international markets, which in recent weeks have shown volatility amid the possibility of disruptions in crude supply.

The former president's claim comes after several months of concerns over the presence of explosive devices in the area. Although the technical details of the operation were not immediately provided, the message disseminated by Trump was interpreted by analysts as an attempt to project force and deterrence against Iran, which in the past has threatened to close the strait in retaliation for international sanctions.

Reactions and Iranian silence

The Strait of Hormuz concentrates approximately one-fifth of global oil traffic, which makes any disruption a serious threat to the global economy. The resumption of transit under safe conditions is seen by energy operators as a stabilizing factor, at a time when crude prices have reflected the uncertainty derived from the diplomatic standoff between both powers.

Vice President J.D. Vance, mentioned by several sources as part of the innermost circle in the formulation of foreign policy, did not issue additional public comments on the announcement. His presence in the debate, however, has been highlighted by U.S. media as indicative of the institutional backing for the line maintained regarding Iran.

The Iranian government, for its part, did not immediately confirm or deny Trump's claims. Officials in Tehran have reiterated in prior statements that any military or intelligence action in the area without prior coordination would be considered a provocation. The absence of a formal response fuels speculation about whether parallel diplomatic channels exist beyond the public statements.

On the regional level, Israel has closely followed the evolution of events in the strait, given its dependence on Gulf energy routes and its concern over Iranian rearmament. Although it did not officially weigh in on the mine clearance, diplomatic sources cited by international media indicate that the operation is viewed with caution in Jerusalem.

Impact on markets and geopolitical reading

Maritime security experts consulted by specialized media recalled that the laying of mines in Hormuz has for decades been one of the main threats contemplated in U.S. Navy contingency plans. The public confirmation of the mine clearance, according to these analysts, could have a short-term deterrent effect, although it does not eliminate the risk of new sabotage actions or a direct confrontation.

In energy markets, the news was met with a moderate drop in crude prices, reflecting the perception of a lower risk of supply disruption. Operators in London and New York stressed, however, that the situation remains fragile and that any unforeseen move could reverse the trend.

Trump's statement falls within a series of recent pronouncements by the former president in which he has adopted a firm tone toward Iran, in line with the stance maintained during his term. Although currently out of office, his statements continue to be followed closely by allied governments and by markets, given his weight within the Republican Party.

Political analysts recall that the credibility of Trump's claims regarding military or intelligence actions has been the subject of debate in the past, with episodes in which his announcements did not fully correspond to verified facts. For now, neither the Pentagon nor the Navy has issued an independent official statement confirming the exact scope of the mine-clearance operation in Hormuz.

In any case, the announcement marks a new chapter in the strategic dispute between the United States and Iran over control of the strait. The international community will observe in the coming days whether the claim translates into an effective stabilization of maritime transit or whether, on the contrary, it opens a new phase of confrontation in one of the most sensitive areas of the planet.