WHO Criticizes U.S. Vaccine Policy and Warns Against Political Influence on Scientific Recommendations

Background of the Controversy

WHO experts also pointed to the importance of combination vaccines. These could reduce the number of doctor visits and increase vaccination rates, they explained. The WHO sees this as an important instrument for improving the acceptance of vaccinations among the population.

WHO expert Kate O'Brien emphasized that the organization's recommendations are based on decades of research. Combination vaccines are safe and efficient and are used successfully worldwide, she said.

Importance of Combination Vaccines

Another point of contention is the discussion about autism diagnoses. The WHO once again rejected notions that certain vaccinations could cause autism. Numerous studies have shown no connection, the experts explained.

Tedros called on governments worldwide to resist attempts to politicize vaccination programs. The health of the population must not become a plaything of political interests, he warned.

Reactions and Outlook

The U.S. government has so far not publicly responded to the accusations. Tensions between Washington and the WHO had escalated in recent months, including over differing positions on international health agreements.

The WHO announced that it would continue to publish its scientific recommendations and communicate them transparently. It would not be swayed by political pressure, it said from Geneva.

International health organizations are observing the developments with concern. A split in global vaccine policy could, according to experts, undermine confidence in vaccination programs worldwide.