China Criticizes US Tariffs: "Serious Concern" Ahead of Summit

In addition to the tariffs, according to Chinese sources, further points of contention are on the table, including export controls in the area of advanced technologies and issues related to robotics and semiconductors. Beijing sees this as an attempt to deliberately hinder China's industrial development and criticizes this policy as unilateral and discriminatory.

Reactions from Washington and Beijing

Scott Bessent had previously defended the government's trade policy as an instrument for strengthening the American economy and curbing unfair practices. He pointed to the need to secure strategic supply chains and promote domestic production in key industries.

He Lifeng, who is responsible for trade negotiations, had also recently expressed criticism of the US measures. He warned that a prolonged trade conflict would harm both economies and jeopardize the recovery of the global economy. At the same time, Beijing is signaling its willingness to engage in dialogue but insists on mutual respect and compliance with international agreements.

Significance for the Planned Summit in September

Observers see the wording "serious concern" as a deliberately chosen diplomatic escalation level that remains below a formal protest note but nevertheless marks clear red lines. It is seen as a signal to Washington not to take any further unilateral steps before the presidential meeting in September. At the same time, Beijing is keeping the door open for negotiations.

Economically, the impact of the additional tariff is already visible in bilateral trade data. Exporters in both countries are reporting rising costs, longer delivery times, and uncertainty among business customers. Industry associations are calling for a swift solution in order to limit further damage to small and medium-sized enterprises.

The upcoming meeting between the presidents is being watched closely internationally, as its course will send signals for the future shape of the global economy. If it succeeds in reducing trade differences, this could stabilize global markets. If, on the other hand, the fronts remain hard, a phase of sustained tensions looms that would also affect third countries.