Refereeing expert Wagner criticizes disallowed Tah goal as wrong decision
Frankfurt am Main, 30 June 2026
AI-generated image (z-image via Kie.ai)
Summary
In the round of 16 of the 2026 FIFA World Cup match between Germany and Paraguay, a header by Jonathan Tah in the 102nd minute was disallowed after a VAR intervention. Refereeing expert Lutz Wagner sees this as a clear wrong decision and thereby supports the criticism voiced by head coach Julian Nagelsmann.
Frankfurt am Main, 30 June 2026
Refereeing expert Lutz Wagner has criticized the disallowing of Jonathan Tah's headed goal in the World Cup round of 16 match between Germany and Paraguay by referee Jalal Jayed of Morocco as a wrong decision.
Background: The VAR intervention in the 102nd minute
Germany has been eliminated in the round of 16 of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The team of head coach Julian Nagelsmann lost to Paraguay after 120 minutes and the subsequent penalty shootout, with a controversial refereeing decision shaping the match. In the 102nd minute, Jonathan Tah had headed the ball into the net to give Germany a temporary 2:1 lead after a corner kick from Nathaniel Brown, but the goal was disallowed following a video assistant intervention.
Referee Jalal Jayed of Morocco was called to the monitor by video assistant Tatiana Guzman of Nicaragua after she claimed to have spotted an alleged foul by Waldemar Anton on Paraguay's goalkeeper Orlando Gill. After reviewing the footage, Jayed ruled a foul and annulled the goal. Jayed has been a FIFA referee since 2019 and has been active in the Moroccan top flight since 2015. He has also officiated matches at the Africa Cup, among others, and refereed the match between Portugal and Uzbekistan (5:0). In the current tournament, it was his second assignment involving Germany, having previously officiated the 7:1 victory over Curaçao.
On the Sportschau program, refereeing expert Lutz Wagner sharply criticized the decision. In his assessment, the contact between Anton and Gill was by no means a foul-worthy offense. „Für mich wäre Weiterspielen die richtige Entscheidung gewesen. Ein klares Vergehen sehe ich nicht“, said Wagner. He also did not regard the arm position of Gustavo Gómez in the 98th minute, when a shot by Nick Woltemade was blocked, as a punishable handball: „Das war kein strafbares Handspiel. Er vergrößert nicht die Abwehrfläche, er hatte den Arm vor dem Körper. Wenn er sie vom Körper abgespreizt hätte, könnte man diskutieren."
Wagner's assessment of the key scenes
Wagner also pointed to the role of the goalkeeper. „Der Torwart hat im Fünfmeterraum keine Sonderrechte, er hat am Spiel teilnehmen können“, said the expert. Regarding the positioning of the two opponents before the disallowed goal, Wagner added: „Für mich orientieren sich beide zum Ball." Moreover, it was Gill who moved toward Anton rather than the other way around: „Eher macht der Torwart Orlando Gill eine Bewegung zu Waldemar Anton." With this, Wagner fundamentally calls into question the argument of the VAR team that Anton had impeded the goalkeeper.
Former English referee Mark Clattenburg, who works for the US broadcaster Fox Sports, also saw a clear foul in the scene – but on Paraguay's side. „Das ist ein klares Foul für mich“, said Clattenburg with regard to the incident, without explicitly referring to the disallowed goal. The Englishman thereby positioned himself against the perception of the German experts.
Reactions from the German camp
Head coach Julian Nagelsmann had sharply attacked the decision on ZDF. „Das ist nicht mal ansatzweise ein Foulspiel", said Nagelsmann in the interview with ZDF. He had previously described the decision to MagentaTV as a „Witz" and, after the match, sharpened his tone once more: „Das ist nicht nur ein Skandal, das ist ein Vollskandal". He ruled out resigning: „keiner, der wegläuft" sei er.
Former world champion Christoph Kramer also called for self-criticism. „Du darfst gegen Paraguay nicht in die Verlängerung kommen", said the former midfielder, who had been part of the German squad in 2014. With a view to the public debate, he added: „Dazu darf es niemals kommen." Jonathan Tah himself also appeared affected after the match, but did not want to overdramatize the debate: „Alle sind am Boden zerstört. Für mich war das auf jeden Fall kein Foul. Wir müssen uns an die eigene Nase packen."
Kinhöfer criticizes referee and VAR
ZDF expert and former referee Thorsten Kinhöfer also piled on and described the decision as incomprehensible. „Die Entscheidung ist absolut nicht nachvollziehbar. Das ist nie und nimmer ein Foul, überhaupt nicht. Das ist handelsüblich", said Kinhöfer. He assessed the contact between Anton and Gill as normal: „Das ist ein normaler Kontakt, das ist nie und nimmer ein Foul. Mir fehlen die Worte." The goalkeeper had also gotten back up immediately: „der Torwart steht sofort wieder auf". Kinhöfer also criticized the behavior of the official at the monitor: „Und der zweite Fehler ist, dass der Schiedsrichter auf gut Deutsch gesagt nicht so viel ‹Cojones› hatte, sich über diese Entscheidung hinwegzusetzen und zu sagen: Nein, das ist kein Foul, das ist für mich ein glasklares Tor." In terms of content, he made clear: „Anton habe weder gehalten noch gerempelt, und der Torhüter geniesse im Fünfmeterraum «keinen besonderen Schutz, deswegen ist das eine klare Fehlentscheidung»".
Appearing as a MagentaTV expert, Jürgen Klopp also weighed in. He called the decision „brutal": „Dementsprechend ist das natürlich brutal. Es entscheiden Kleinigkeiten – und das ist eine grosse Kleinigkeit, die entscheidet. Denn wir gewinnen das Spiel, wenn der Ball drin ist." With a glance at English football, he added sarcastically: „Fakt ist, wenn dieses Tor irregulär ist, dann wird Arsenal nicht englischer Meister. Ich glaube, die haben 60 Prozent ihrer Tore so geschossen."
Ittrich, Amhof and Klopp with differing assessments
The German criticism, however, found only partial agreement from referee Patrick Ittrich, likewise deployed as a MagentaTV expert. While he too stated: „Ich sehe kein Wegdrücken, kein Wegstoßen", and judged the intervention as „zu kleinlich", he did not want to call it an unequivocal wrong decision: „Für mich ist das keine klare Fehlentscheidung vom Schiedsrichter". SRF refereeing expert Sascha Amhof, for his part, did not see any offense by Anton: „Der Deutsche steht einfach da. Beide rangeln um den Platz, das ist völlig okay."
Per Mertesacker, also a 2014 world champion, turned the focus to the team's sporting performance. „Wir haben gegen die schwächste Mannschaft aus der Vorrunde gespielt und haben es nicht geschafft, mehr als zwei Chancen in 120 Minuten zu bekommen", said the former international. Looking back at earlier expectations, he added: „Vor zwei Jahren wurde geflachst, wir müssen nur zwei Jahre warten, bis wir Weltmeister werden. Die Aussage können wir total vergessen." Paraguay had finished the group stage with a 1:4 loss to the USA, a 1:0 win over Turkey, and a 0:0 draw with Australia.
Outlook and consequences for the DFB team
The exit marks the earliest World Cup tournament exit for a German team in a long time. Following the match, the debate over the use of the video assistant will continue, especially since the incident in the first half of extra time brought the decisive turning point. In the wake of the encounter, Paraguay advances to the quarterfinals, where they will face the winner of the match between France and Sweden.
One thing is certain: for the German team, the tournament ended near Boston with a penalty shootout defeat after 120 minutes in which, despite long periods of dominance, they failed to create more than two clear chances against the third-placed group finisher Paraguay. Tah's disallowed goal thus remains the central point of contention in a match that would have raised questions on sporting grounds regardless.
The text is based on a report from the dpa news agency, written by Ralf Lorenzen.
Questions & Answers
Why was Jonathan Tah's goal disallowed in the World Cup match between Germany and Paraguay?
Referee Jalal Jayed of Morocco disallowed the goal after a prompt from video assistant Tatiana Guzman of Nicaragua, because he claimed to have seen a foul by Waldemar Anton on Paraguay's goalkeeper Orlando Gill.
What does refereeing expert Lutz Wagner say about the decision?
Lutz Wagner sees the disallowing as a wrong decision. In his assessment, the contact was normal, the goalkeeper moved toward Anton, and there was no clear offense.
How did head coach Julian Nagelsmann react to the incident?
Nagelsmann called the decision „nicht mal ansatzweise ein Foulspiel" on ZDF and subsequently spoke of a „Vollskandal", but ruled out stepping down as head coach.